From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#3588: bug#3596: NS: wrong font chosen Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:38:13 +0000 Message-ID: References: <628E52D6-0BA6-4A48-82DA-64B678ABDB0D@gmail.com> <21178782-C83E-4F19-AA19-CD0887F2566B@gmail.com> <1F314607-B8A8-4D62-93B4-86B455805861@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1453653562 28042 80.91.229.3 (24 Jan 2016 16:39:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 3588@debbugs.gnu.org, Adrian Robert , 3596@debbugs.gnu.org To: David Reitter Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 24 17:39:17 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNh6-0005bc-KF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 17:39:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60979 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNh0-0006CY-Q8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgv-0006Au-Vg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:39:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgs-0002PU-Pr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:39:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46851) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgs-0002PQ-LI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgs-0000NW-DM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 3588 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 3588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B3588.14536535041390 (code B ref 3588); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 16:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 3588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jan 2016 16:38:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35068 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgG-0000MM-4j for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com ([74.125.82.43]:38213) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aNNgD-0000Ln-6F; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:38:21 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id b14so47206665wmb.1; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:38:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Lo2M3vKaZTb3sL4hATSa2ZkXjmgp3IgLFNjggPymgL0=; b=MnYyB3fTkSQjtZSya1W5W0nPiYJCwJPX+6F52ka/Zp+AzrbbhQMLkTD6cVwxqz90IN Q480skZ2qhHSfY34xpNB8p3grfxLfvLvxE0NVbhZRKXCT6w4HXuLvSFXDZTvCLtxZcU2 8Sga8cE+4Qet2NznoI72pMTd8+ieGkxoEipC8GWjRfwkRRdth/onkSRJpVsXvE4sbWEz QUtdSjlOyEgo5w/+a18H0+rxfQV9eWwTkVOCn0Hv5WtZG3D+X1LXeny8l7sAcwLXGBvp xaoWG1ZBuXnGBCGuXBv+OQqEOiVTLaDR7S4Mo0f9Ot1Yoxe2m0agZoIzxvWFxzuQV06E lOpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Lo2M3vKaZTb3sL4hATSa2ZkXjmgp3IgLFNjggPymgL0=; b=DuCWU3H5I/0ni8wVSascWKyZAh40S6cgLrB/5rDK6onGhvgs13t6tJu2Q2X2DUm80Y +qKROdDjOJrp3wA8gS/tdE7Jxisd/y0knPd1fXAu52zc1ekDMvORPVz1XnUHU+QBt3rS HmosyYeDe0Pp2KuUq1oTfLOQTd+LXGTQvjQkaC+hfRG0C27uFVf4hKhjUWb7r9AU9e/B GLK0z8hhpwUeDrGtv9T7Jsi2TF3uckNvdaV4/AwOlGu5aq8kByZOnNNDwv4oce8170C5 A1L7641X2GXaGol9agZejyTjkg20NcPP4h/tnAr5v3beEZOGmgUkYpqfmuoQXs95ib95 qV1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOShJ0pz5jNoxALZi4tV3jgasIKBjR/l4Ov/HOSlTyUju60H5kS/nivxoLkcXkzuAA== X-Received: by 10.28.222.86 with SMTP id v83mr13062364wmg.17.1453653495675; Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:38:15 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from galloway.idiocy.org (7.a.9.a.8.2.1.a.e.1.8.3.0.c.5.c.9.2.1.8.8.f.3.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:c5c0:381e:a128:a9a7]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lc3sm15214963wjb.7.2016.01.24.08.38.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 24 Jan 2016 08:38:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1F314607-B8A8-4D62-93B4-86B455805861@gmail.com> (David Reitter's message of "Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:12:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111923 Archived-At: David Reitter writes: > On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:10 AM, Adrian Robert wrote: > >> Hmm, Lucida Calligraphy has 'italic' set, which I assume causes >> emacs to not use it for non-italic text. However, I wonder why it >> is creating a synth-italic entity here -- it shouldn't. > > That's right, there's only an italic variant of it. (If I demand > italic, it uses it and does NOT use a synthetic variant.) > > If there's only an italic variant, it should be used as regular, and, > in principle, the italic variant should be realized as a synthetic > font. Normally what I've seen done there in print is that if a block > of text is emphasized in italics, the extra-emphasized portions of it > are then regular. So you could create a synthetic variant with slant > to the left (using the existing slant (degree) information). I can't reproduce this in Emacs 25. I don't have Lucida Calligraphy, but Brush Script MT appears to only have Italic and it displays fine. I can't make it give me a synthetic italic of the italic, though. It always looks the same. -- Alan Third