From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alex Bochannek Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61549: 30.0.50; [PATCH] New keyboard macro counter functions Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 12:07:56 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83sff41zgm.fsf@gnu.org> <83fsb2xhzp.fsf@gnu.org> <86ed9t5btc.fsf@gnu.org> <87h6eahqcd.fsf@web.de> <864jaamfb3.fsf@gnu.org> <871q5da5l6.fsf@web.de> <875xunxzs4.fsf@web.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19264"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , larsi@gnus.org, 61549@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 08 01:29:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sFj1P-0004kX-NH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 08 Jun 2024 01:29:23 +0200 Original-Received: from [::1] (helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFezA-0004If-0R; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:10:48 -0400 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::10] (helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFez9-0004IF-3X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:10:47 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sFez8-0001Pn-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFezN-0008Uj-Ps for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:11:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alex Bochannek Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 19:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61549 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 61549-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61549.171778741932522 (code B ref 61549); Fri, 07 Jun 2024 19:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61549) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jun 2024 19:10:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53263 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFeyg-0008SU-QJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:10:19 -0400 Original-Received: from ns.lapseofthought.com ([50.0.39.240]:23361 helo=mail.lapseofthought.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sFews-0008Mz-DK for 61549@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 07 Jun 2024 15:08:27 -0400 Original-Received: from awb-mbp.local (c-24-23-131-202.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.23.131.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lapseofthought.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4VwrLr6YBkz3pdF2; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 12:08:04 -0700 (PDT) Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=alex smtp.mailfrom=alex@bochannek.com In-Reply-To: <875xunxzs4.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:52:27 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:286787 Archived-At: Michael, Michael Heerdegen writes: > Have you thought about the idea to provide some more explicit way to > control the automatic increment of a kmacro counter, like a mathematical > formula (a function of one argument, the old counter value, that would > calculate the next counter value)? Given your experience with keyboard > macros usage, would that be a useful thing? I think this is a very reasonable idea. I'll have a look at how to generalize this and submit a patch. It will probably take me a little while, but it won't be a year again ;) -- Alex.