From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Subject: Re: an annoying indentation Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:30:59 +0100 Message-ID: References: <41c818190706120920m24756516y35406f2763e83b15@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyBST-0002TD-1K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:13 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HyBSR-0002S2-9K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:11 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HyBSR-0002Rz-2l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:11 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HyBSQ-0000Fo-Fc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 14:51:10 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HyBKk-0005Qq-FV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:43:14 +0200 Received: from sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.223.202]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:43:14 +0200 Received: from sdl.web by sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 20:43:14 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org ----- William Henney (2007-06-12) wrote:----- > Hi Leo > > On 6/12/07, Leo wrote: >> Anyone else find the following annoying? >> > > Yes, but... > >> *** heading 1 >> - item 1 >> - item 2 >> >> Now hit tabwith cursor right before '-', it becomes, >> >> *** heading 1 >> - item 1 >> - item 2 >> > > ... I reported this to the list last week and Carsten pointed out that > it was impossible to tell whether "item 2" represented a continuation > of the same list or the start of a new nested list. Although I agree > with him, I feel that a saner default would be to assume the former. > After all, the same reasoning applies to headings, and they /do/ work > how I would expect. > > Cheers > > Will I think item 2 should be aligned to item 1 as the same level after TAB. If users want a sublist they could easily use 'M-' to do that. However, when an item of the list is not aligned with its heading, the quickest way is to use 'TAB'. -- Leo (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)