From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Emacs facilities from Gnus Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:45:43 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zly3y4ru.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87odejy30k.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <87bqa8z601.fsf@arnested.dk> <87hcjz80jr.fsf@arnested.dk> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1194604828 16887 80.91.229.12 (9 Nov 2007 10:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 10:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, Arne =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F8rgensen?= To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 09 11:40:28 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IqRHh-00079X-2N for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:40:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqRHV-0006E5-D6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:40:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqRHP-0006Ck-LR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IqRHN-0006Bz-Sh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IqRHN-0006Bw-OW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:40:01 -0500 Original-Received: from ns.km1136.keymachine.de ([62.141.58.119] helo=km1136.keymachine.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IqRHJ-0002sJ-EK; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:39:57 -0500 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.de (xdslct067.osnanet.de [89.166.147.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by km1136.keymachine.de (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id lA9Adq2E004352; Fri, 9 Nov 2007 11:39:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=kenny.sha-bang.de) by kenny.sha-bang.de with esmtp (Kenny MUA v.0409034.42) ID 1IqRMt-0005oh-E4; Fri, 09 Nov 2007 11:45:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 07 Nov 2007 13:20:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:82859 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> + (if (or (featurep 'xemacs) >> + ;; For Emacs >= 22 we don't need smime-ldap.el >> + (>= emacs-major-version 22)) >> + (progn >> + (require 'smime-ldap) [...] > Those kinds of test qualify as "yucky" in my book. > I'd rather do > > (ignore-errors (require 'smime-ldap)) and then (fboundp 'smime-ldap-search). Emacs 22 require has an optional argument NOERROR, so (require 'smime-ldap nil t) would be safe (and one can use the return value). But I don't know if it is portable... cheers sascha -- Sascha Wilde Nothing is fool-proof to a sufficiently talented fool.