From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:20:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4CAA0FFC.5020809@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286274095 25926 80.91.229.12 (5 Oct 2010 10:21:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:21:35 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 05 12:21:34 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P34eL-0003BW-OR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55260 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P34eL-0001b7-0Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:21:33 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=33612 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P34e7-0001aZ-4a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:21:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P34e0-00023Q-S5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:21:19 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P34e0-00022u-MY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 06:21:12 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P34dx-00031y-O0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:09 +0200 Original-Received: from dial-178136.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.178.136]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:09 +0200 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by dial-178136.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Oct 2010 12:21:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-178136.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dAQ1rLwLeBr6P9wIrk5GpKb2SjY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131360 Archived-At: * Richard Stallman [2010-10-05 09:55] writes: > Meanwhile, there is a further issue. If we move these symbols into > the standard Elisp, we need to document them in the Lisp Reference > manual. We could certainly do that, with some work. But it would > also make the Elisp manual bigger and more expensive. There is already a manual in doc/misc/cl.texi. Helmut