From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Suggestion to have highlight related bindings consistent between search-map and hi-lock-map Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:46 -0800 Message-ID: References: <874mlaearx.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <55A21229.6080903@gmail.com> <55A27E53.7020605@gmail.com> <834ml99zkp.fsf@gnu.org> <831tgd9wcm.fsf@gnu.org> <55AB58FB.8000501@gmail.com> <87r3nqk34p.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <878u96yl2o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <877fik2blb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454636948 23386 80.91.229.3 (5 Feb 2016 01:49:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 01:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kaushal Modi To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 05 02:49:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aRVW9-00071n-6P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:49:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45296 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRVW8-0003D5-He for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:49:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39889) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRVW4-0003Af-L5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:48:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRVW1-0006zG-Fm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:48:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]:36824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRVW1-0006z0-8B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 20:48:53 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n128so59192328pfn.3 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=8KYb+PHOFm1H37yJp0hAx0jwMp56NQXnnGnyALf0u30=; b=fz0VfOb/2tSNKHmYVmYf7rT5ZIw0/iDhSv/dW8Mi7WuCudhGbeihglxQHFgJdkwyBb VJfBCK2BXWL97ix/6m1MnksI7c6oShMvGuF24otJQRbVmzuuoGVjoAwjEdvqLLgQ1QjS qz7TTDt5+74ogJm1c3EEkYMqWvk2aQV9Z3JyV9NdJ2wZDtud1tSa9I9UgTfIU0NfwcIC McuqP7sHhbVnTrQpgxZ0zXAnpv37ipT32+YSXkJJFD/2d+AF4Zn7mdTIQ1+i94GnHpp5 9FYqeg6wFOj7GykFhq4G7gxl8WnW0Ul/YdS2ODLpPblydwdwDYd7y284JlEDP4C0xAu3 1p/Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=8KYb+PHOFm1H37yJp0hAx0jwMp56NQXnnGnyALf0u30=; b=UbdZYrKjasW+dJXRwSGIXwU38mvdTN3kYrHJ268Ov7THssi0PwzAvpeAKphobzxtFD iURZ0l0A+8BGhATT/7iQ65XRmgGsaKfs1+Nni4qgX0I5G+6ULISMSvJrVJykPAkJZxjo wCkA5wROfZrQ0s4hWGe/POeDJ/A8bPVLPPR/jgb8KBraEB8i8H3AFi4DhHGvlj1BmKTq aQ+2G8oYy+5jESfOYN2+l110MIGEdM5IndDjtsml0jhaLN5IkdAMwX2QOy6+x2cH84P1 w+lr/D839tQhHvWQZw/xpNhCskecYAjK7GgrlKtGjVqtV7NfKGpaPRG0o5COZ8RTQP4E 9Taw== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORmUsqjYHbX3slzdEYzBT4sJgvJMcc3gKgIeszMiSr77m6rzAe7lovwlgIaJ76xCw== X-Received: by 10.98.64.202 with SMTP id f71mr16122557pfd.113.1454636932499; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Hermes.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b28sm20008706pfd.24.2016.02.04.17.48.51 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:48:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Hermes.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 316784D89B25; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 17:48:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <877fik2blb.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 05 Feb 2016 02:54:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Juri Linkov , Kaushal Modi , emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199345 Archived-At: >>>>> Juri Linkov writes: >> The source of this discussion is because I kept getting confused if I need >> to do "M-s h r" or "C-x w r" to highlight a regexp. So after a point, I >> bound C-x w to nil to solve the problem. >> >> That made me think that this topic should also be brought up in this thread >> and have this fixed directly in the source. > Maybe conducting a poll will help to see how many users will be > disappointed. How long have we had both? -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2