From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: On language-dependent defaults for character-folding Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:58:33 -0800 Message-ID: References: <838u2hu6aq.fsf@gnu.org> <871t899tde.fsf@gnus.org> <83y4ahru04.fsf@gnu.org> <83fuwproyf.fsf@gnu.org> <837fi0sz29.fsf@gnu.org> <83egc8qzjh.fsf@gnu.org> <87egc7evu3.fsf@gnus.org> <83io1jpt4u.fsf@gnu.org> <87povqhj25.fsf@gnus.org> <87povqe5tr.fsf@gnus.org> <87ziuta4l4.fsf@gnus.org> <8360xhmn3a.fsf@gnu.org> <87y4adxuq4.fsf@gnus.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456167556 20800 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 18:59:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 18:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , lokedhs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 19:59:08 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXvhK-0004sn-69 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 19:59:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51263 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXvhJ-0006T4-JU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:59:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41850) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXvh2-0006Rr-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:58:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXvh0-0002Ck-GL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:58:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]:34417) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXvgv-0002AP-0r; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 13:58:41 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id fy10so95316331pac.1; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:58:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type; bh=x6w8xJ3JNXQF0QBhLUhsE0KAt3KOT/NOCCpOKVQW55c=; b=mh57RafeUxOOPXD4UFjIY5Z1vqZ5oJmqVQF92VK7LQFPXu/q2EdTB43nugz7VHjoN4 fCbJjbodFIt01vuHmld9KrmR4l9/5LmZtyqOQ5RKBbEL4DA1IYrx8nWGq7JVDyFgWekx piVlWVDfeA0t4OjsCraaZMlS4VpUTX4tJcChVOsrz/UHKiie1bHcaU9tMhfZ7FTiw4wK +Z4QJtcgzI+tQIdV0YR/1rdrFbXesuk/EFhpHbociV2K8wsQbor9ZFai0lxzlatbP2la HQhuMKQX45jN+hnMx6ATcTsQiJnPD5dcszPyRdwxcO7p6+gUINOah4v67nfG6lhwcuLJ Ks/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type; bh=x6w8xJ3JNXQF0QBhLUhsE0KAt3KOT/NOCCpOKVQW55c=; b=CtEIMwZfPPtUKVcJpFf1lK0L60DvONAitj3OiQNC/qRoYkwQe4oExXjqoSMX9kk+cS 8EQew+2yVlcrDWyaybNJ+6av+xtMemW9EVffNUi94LmsfPws6Gps0kcOAtFs6w5oO7og RPGb/tFTJ4pTVioLakv+rA66u51Q7eE36tWM22wPRLpo2lvjGnKSMqH9CclWfCheq5B0 4r8oZ8B7R72HnjN1ILLM75ync+DaAAvf9Z3UvRZRShPyHdUfv7rLksWiEyykWf/wF4Cg H5LiUPF8wH2V2vEewp5Nnv1EkcYoAB/rfTiHKEvnP9zFl6+/p5QrrQxeb92drc2jooEr U3bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOTLNTIrRmW0L1/vDNW2mh1ETLA9f08FoUXTGBH5/k4dykOhh7UukEp/Q3AonvtUOA== X-Received: by 10.66.65.109 with SMTP id w13mr40180066pas.142.1456167519997; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:58:39 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h65sm38578316pfh.43.2016.02.22.10.58.37 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:58:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id A629513125D89; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:58:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y4adxuq4.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:57:39 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Eli Zaretskii , lokedhs@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:200488 Archived-At: >>>>> Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > I am describing how Emacs works today. I'm worried that this very long discussion on character-folding is going nowhere. We're over 200 messages now, and it seems that the same arguments are being repeated about what does and does not constitute a letter to be folded. Or maybe my eyes glazed over, and that's what I think I'm seeing... If there are other technical discussions to be branched from this topic, now would be a good time to start new threads for them, if for no other reason than to clarify what the outcome of those threads should hopefully be. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2