From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Moore Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: defcustom and the stars. Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:32:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1168376901 13337 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2007 21:08:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 21:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 09 22:08:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4OCa-0006Lg-MD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:08:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4OCa-0004Wz-3c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:08:12 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Lln-00038g-FX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:23 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Llk-00036q-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:22 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H4Llk-00036n-72 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:20 -0500 Original-Received: from [66.249.92.168] (helo=ug-out-1314.google.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H4Llj-00088P-KQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 13:32:19 -0500 Original-Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id j3so7403924ugf for ; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:32:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:to:references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:x-sa-exim-connect-ip:x-sa-exim-mail-from:x-spam-checker-version:x-spam-level:x-spam-status:subject:x-sa-exim-version:x-sa-exim-scanned; b=tlvQ3KCS7z+NLMR82qBP6Feg+rIMEFaUxTDM+0eaq4EQ9BKRGup7wlTN3AFu8i6/FHdIC9Le/Tv9Zo9wORnAr6MweYfNecjbAMmrRYTbUXstRrv0WRDxlWQ4W2Gp4r5d36sx/9xHPo8OE4TyjV0fs/oS17SjvwrZd/NeZ/E9HKA= Original-Received: by 10.67.117.2 with SMTP id u2mr36481076ugm.1168367538368; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:32:18 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from chrislap.local ( [89.176.28.156]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 13sm34449272ugb.2007.01.09.10.32.11; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 10:32:11 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chrislap.local) by chrislap.local with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H4LlY-0001qG-Jj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:32:09 +0100 Original-To: In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Mon\, 8 Jan 2007 20\:21\:06 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sun, 03 Dec 2006 00:39:09 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on chrislap.local) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 16:07:58 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:65074 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: >> Could it be that the list doesn't forward mail to you if it can see >> that you're already getting a copy directly? > > Dunno > >> And could it also be >> that when people were mailing you directly, they were using a >> different address than the mailing list had for you? > > No. I have only one address. Interestingly, the address you just used to reply to me isn't signed up to this mailing list and yet I still only received one copy of your reply. Mails to my 'dooglus' email address (which is on the mailing list) get forwarded to my full.name email address - but there's no way the mailing list software can know that. So I think the only explanation is that gmail itself is seeing 2 messages which it determines are 'the same' in some way (maybe by comparing Message-ID headers, for example) and deciding to only keep one of them. If this is what's happening, then it's already OK to CC replies to people who are using a gmail address, since they'll only see one copy of the mail anyway.