From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: more on starttls, gnutls-cli and using tls for mail Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:03:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20039.8838.116211.694328@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <8762m0n5qi.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ipq0k0q0.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fwl4nqu8.fsf@gmail.com> <87fwl3vxl8.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1313564654 15402 80.91.229.12 (17 Aug 2011 07:04:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2011 07:04:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 17 09:04:10 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAb-0000bK-9f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:04:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55745 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAa-0007Kj-MW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:04:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57567) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAX-0007KW-Rb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:04:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAW-000272-4E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:04:05 -0400 Original-Received: from v3-1008.vxen.de ([79.140.41.8]:58229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAV-00025L-RQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 03:04:04 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=8thisp8mApRMHHqBJNtCgGAfYnAbX7BH+Xc5CtvEhW4=; b=u/7zAwealuyDKI+mNV8JFp7C1SfXwk6HN8lTmrZw9e2eef7K9cFNhUp4e84IMFNbtmle6zTaJkuYhAS8m0kfpzI5IrscVcUwBFnh+VM61gmcRc0YPJETR5+18zavb533; Original-Received: from ibookg4-c2.pc.gwdg.de ([134.76.4.219]) by v3-1008.vxen.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QtaAN-0005AR-Kh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Aug 2011 09:03:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Tim Cross's message of "Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:03:00 +1000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 79.140.41.8 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143352 Archived-At: Tim Cross writes: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:21 PM, David Engster wrote: >> Tim Cross writes: >>> Is there any technical reason that requires this? I frequently use >>> authenticated smtp, but just auithenticate as one user and send email > >>> with from/return addresses of different users with no problems. >> >> Then you've been lucky. See >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework >> >> -David >> >> > > As I understood it, SPF is domain/host based, not individual user > based. Correct. I thought we were talking about the general case why it makes sense to choose different SMTP hosts dependending on the FROM address. As long as you're using the same domain, SPF is not an issue, indeed. -David