From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13663: 24.2.93; Why warn `flet' is an obsolete macro at runtime? Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 14:22:55 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1360477433 31811 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2013 06:23:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:23:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13663-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 10 07:24:14 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKj-0008HY-Se for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 07:24:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKQ-0006Pl-HA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:54 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45218) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKM-0006P7-Pv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKL-0007ql-OU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:50 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKL-0007qe-L9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QKY-00075I-8E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:24:02 -0500 Resent-From: Leo Liu Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:24:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13663 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13663@debbugs.gnu.org, sdl.web@gmail.com, sdl.web@gmail.com Original-Received: via spool by 13663-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13663.136047740127183 (code D ref 13663); Sun, 10 Feb 2013 06:24:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13663-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Feb 2013 06:23:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47871 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QJq-00074J-CD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43]:64029) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U4QJo-00074A-C2 for 13663-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:23:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id bh2so2708935pad.16 for <13663-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:23:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=45eB2dbLU3J9OCz27JbL7Dvo77hj0+Cwb7/erDOpdMg=; b=Sf+Ufqy6EGdfqaKXuzomqwlwS6Fl2L807+EGesknTya11ZgQvWQZHM2nndwoYFDqoo 72pqVOR9FfSXk/Q2Do+7UiRapvdRjq6YkfRwfBNT2bki341A7QlcjaAmh8FisNc2MGWI FJZjZV2oX1XbaIzDIYyU+PscKcVIVtOGxH/HulKDoC+JAN6RDdXxD9cbxljZT3VL2cBS 9grYRALji3jqT9v0bxYn+/fMHt+PIv6tvVQFFqXFBeVbI9OkjAUlCKRbCjsZ//RJFvvx LgPnM1nnr1I5ss2DDH7BZEqFUoE6O1KLcI3vMYE9+HqF33jW90Cww7fMm4qruGyrEfKd JxRQ== X-Received: by 10.66.87.8 with SMTP id t8mr31937642paz.28.1360477382535; Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:23:02 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Shidais-iMac.local ([119.255.41.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q4sm62765720paz.20.2013.02.09.22.22.59 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Feb 2013 22:23:01 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:04:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.93 (OS X 10.8.2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:70989 Archived-At: On 2013-02-10 10:04 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: [snipped 7 lines] > Good question. Basically, the question is: why is this flet > macro-expanded so late (instead of during byte-compilation)? > > > Stefan Looks like message.el needs recompilation. I have just done that and the warning is gone. Leo