From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrew Hyatt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2501: 22.2.1: terminal mrxvt white - fonts are unreadable Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:17:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87prh3ssf1.fsf@jondo.cante.net> <200902271822.n1RIMBBh018222@rodan.ics.uci.edu> <87prh3ps2x.fsf_-_@jondo.cante.net> <200902272014.n1RKEIC9020508@rodan.ics.uci.edu> <877i3bpmer.fsf@jondo.cante.net> <837fjci1yp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452917899 28096 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2016 04:18:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 04:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dann@ics.uci.edu, 2501@debbugs.gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 16 05:18:09 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJV-0004LD-Bm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Jan 2016 05:18:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49782 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJU-0001UM-JW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:18:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54792) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJR-0001U4-6e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:18:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJO-0007pM-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33893) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJN-0007pI-Td for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:18:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIJN-0000ft-QF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:18:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andrew Hyatt Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2016 04:18:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 2501 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2501-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B2501.14529178542550 (code B ref 2501); Sat, 16 Jan 2016 04:18:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2501) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2016 04:17:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50346 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIIv-0000f4-N6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:17:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qk0-f175.google.com ([209.85.220.175]:35757) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aKIIu-0000es-Ik for 2501@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y67so61250171qkc.2 for <2501@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:17:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=dec/ZmZHpumMogAFcXlizB+jz0vQmAk7cmc4Nyfl3Q4=; b=WSapwUsXWnh0oetVntdtaHsh+TGln/V2PB7q7V9Pjl61DJqIiDkd0g8ivIdF1t8mY6 7yrZruQTVYHf+mVjdlFzsG8qmsthtOjrnyfIzHNBGmo6QFiP1EhQwMpJvvEF5/djmbik n0rov6bqGgGZ+9uLoYLsJrcofPWY6BkqBIMhXYzyq95ZEJkSgfh5y68lXFpZSESQhm0c p6BhxTJ55K94nc7ve4qEUcyOqY5vs/K9oSO5yKaxNFu1rQRgqrmAzTcyF59y2cWWvPZ4 Vgpz0vnPgCMAB4zc7GAXE5RnDwVmMSeTJB1e+FiSnskOQyD65HshSbSzXWYPdGY34ujC gafg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=dec/ZmZHpumMogAFcXlizB+jz0vQmAk7cmc4Nyfl3Q4=; b=R0zJoID6BgQuxSSVXz2sPOb0bVhfEfrJ9TwfKIPayh/3t/W/nv7Xp4G5wQoaP4kFLM C8T6BWCEPrQTcjOTk4pUkY+BXxQd3pd6m8v+7RBoH5JfFjGWG9cEyRgS5E+niQO9LSgG BHkIvbEYQVnuRIJFCZ8tlh8iHlHhjEnEcHiB5Lndfq/KXt3PR2JTLsQCF7jH2cJQk0qv deFuvN1v/x18YVdIE5ViBK/Z8SIsBoNZd7VTHDj9RedJiMrLoPRwSWpSpsRowwgNp4u9 a/c81YA4S3fL/tE3lVE0JcgqZc84yo6aHrU6ME6YGT9cgawc1JKTuCjWjTZvPejSuwnx sRKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmnuLaryipS6earoi0eo51htehS+R7eXLQ27vyqDpWyXEkehMpmh9M2txnxyHTPBEZL1CARA9rLIcDlirYULhxiA00yAA== X-Received: by 10.55.20.211 with SMTP id 80mr17488574qku.67.1452917847237; Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:17:27 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Andrews-MacBook-Pro.local.ahyatt-laptop (cpe-74-73-128-199.nyc.res.rr.com. [74.73.128.199]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u78sm5800408qge.27.2016.01.15.20.17.26 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:17:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <837fjci1yp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:02:22 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:111663 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andrew Hyatt >> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:58:06 -0500 >> Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , 2501@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> I can reproduce this on an xterm brought up on OS X in Emacs 25, so I'm >> removing the unreproducible tag. >> >> IMHO, Emacs should have a way to configure all faces to be legible. We >> already have shr-color-check thanks to Julien Danjou, it should be an >> interesting project for someone to use that to correct all faces. I >> think trying to squash each instance of an illegible font without that >> sort of solution would be a never-ending task, considering all the >> themes out there. > > That sounds like an enhancement to me, so I think we should tag this > bug report "wishlist". WDYT? Sure, let's consider this a wishlist for the general feature of not having these kinds of unreadable colors. I'll tag this as you suggest.