From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66743: 30.0.50; Crash when dumping reftex Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:37:24 +0200 Message-ID: References: <875y2v592c.fsf@localhost> <83a5s6kgxx.fsf@gnu.org> <87wmvadfkw.fsf@localhost> <83jzraisg0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21564"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: yantar92@posteo.net, 66743@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 25 18:38:49 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgu9-0005Jx-KZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:38:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgtt-0006Dq-Hd; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgts-0006Cu-7r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:38:32 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgtr-0002qI-WF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:38:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvguM-0004jj-7Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66743 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66743-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66743.169825188818122 (code B ref 66743); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66743) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2023 16:38:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59902 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgtU-0004iD-JU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-x135.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::135]:58457) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qvgtO-0004hc-SU for 66743@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 12:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-x135.google.com with SMTP id 2adb3069b0e04-507bd19eac8so8687662e87.0 for <66743@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:37:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1698251846; x=1698856646; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=3D80eXabUu3JWI+AZvbagQUfjX9rhfiNGVitiuxmfLE=; b=MaxTZrGsbRsf0mS3qg6Yof2hOG6JyGsQYwBJsGWMC3jUCvELUz+oNM2Vb4hkhrio57 ghLEc51i0s4D5cugpmwb6pC/0vzuwAFIlJIJKrbWRrhm+4zXGVwdoVoWcB/puF7rj7pO g8MonqZu+I9V3piFNGEIZImYQUmoSdnaN/APTno82dUgDcA3MaVv8ItSOWk++6/FVwQb y81PjQc3gbFqrfdKv/c+o/KvB1D/p41e4dAHi33rzrPbDF3+iLQcurdxtWhT6BFCeltg sBBteuJ8u70/eJ+gPHftrkY/MBqRChH7cKdc2/8XwpAkcss4JuyigOJ0QzIWGT+OmTQD SwQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1698251846; x=1698856646; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=3D80eXabUu3JWI+AZvbagQUfjX9rhfiNGVitiuxmfLE=; b=LRkClyo8QOdrcYqUZS1MlNkHSuObTBDk9S8z0qfqh13xe9d4AkprVfvdCunyLMjq06 Ngr3F9pAwSR0nZ/fXLLtW/6SOHTuZKWkTqY5Nfkm/ZPBjQ4MN5ScDE8eJr9NIoL3dz3M YkoIeJRuyBlaqJofgZhwGWS/iojvjOSQ+C5qI3pLyOeiVuhvB9mxxpRPioVhw6voJnlD dlxdL8kHSEczVSsWIMAmEkxNNureydkZF+nFqRpMlZub1lmOoVjTTRXNNcqSuMmK5K/F J80MWkci7BiJ5q43+c/bLSfyECWhHPvXmemUSxzH57luIO5vGwE6Wa4QuHc6Nm2xWXxd N5Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxqJJtgmymUn0dfyk+3B58aQYOyLKBZkBcYmVHqErlU7blhKSbd 1QQwpjf6BrOZM9IBDsCxP66Bd+ek735fVQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFNdrdJ7mi42QEG/RzMdWpRpgpl+rNF/GXZ+B3YyKVPs26jUFRBq3FzAzqFc4VQYmt17m0GYQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:6c4:b0:503:2555:d1e7 with SMTP id u4-20020a05651206c400b005032555d1e7mr14781037lff.45.1698251846008; Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:37:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Pro.fritz.box (p4fe3a69d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.166.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a11-20020a50858b000000b0052e1783ab25sm9721631edh.70.2023.10.25.09.37.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:37:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83jzraisg0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 25 Oct 2023 19:21:19 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:273200 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > Emacs is always dumped with a few buffers, because temacs needs them > to do the dumping. See this comment text from buffer.c: > > Implementation notes: the buffers we carry from temacs are: > " prin1", "*scratch*", " *Minibuf-0*", "*Messages*", and > " *code-conversion-work*". They are created by > init_buffer_once and init_window_once (which are not called > in the dumped Emacs), and by the first call to coding.c > routines. Thanks. So, one idea would be to try and move the creation of these buffers from the init_*_once functions to the "normal" init functions, and see what happens. One would also have to take a closer look at coding.c, of course.