From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7761: The NS port is still 11 times slower than normal Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:05:22 +0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293704622 21437 80.91.229.12 (30 Dec 2010 10:23:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 10:23:42 +0000 (UTC) To: 7761@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 30 11:23:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFfV-0003d2-6N for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:23:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52291 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYFfU-0004US-AX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:23:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=35596 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYFfN-0004UK-RJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:23:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFfM-0003uk-JH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:23:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46089) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFfM-0003ug-Ho for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:23:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFHi-0002ZN-JB; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 7761 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.12937031289856 (code B ref -1); Thu, 30 Dec 2010 09:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2010 09:58:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFHT-0002Yv-T4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:58:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFHQ-0002Yk-Mh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:58:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFO7-0000Av-6z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:05:40 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:44948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFO7-0000Ar-4y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49591 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PYFO5-00010R-9j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:05:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFO3-0000AS-LC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:05:37 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:35781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFO3-0000AF-Fn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 05:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PYFO1-0005w6-G0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:05:33 +0100 Original-Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.9.122.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:05:33 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:05:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.91 (Mac OS X 10.6.5) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LXiPEqF7PKIMb2+RZ2QtE1mS4V8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:59:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:42927 Archived-At: Hi all, There are numerous bug reports on the issues of NS port, in particular the performance degradation after turning flyspell on. I did a build of the NS port from trunk two days ago. And I tried flyspell-buffer on the about page (C-h C-a). And it was about 11 times slower than a same run on other terminals (X11, tty, Mac) etc. Some of the reports are as old as two years ago. There seems little hope it will shape up in the foreseeable future. I have been told even as it stands today it is already much improved. Meanwhile, we have a better alternative (the macport¹) that provides comparable feature set as in GNU/Linux and without any compromise in performance. I wonder if macport should be merged? Thanks. Leo Footnotes: ¹ ftp://ftp.math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp/emacs