From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61525: 29.0.60; delete-frame will raise frames in another virtual desktop Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:40:47 +0100 Message-ID: References: <835yc2c0vw.fsf@gnu.org> <83k00i81zw.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37290"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (darwin) Cc: 61525@debbugs.gnu.org, justksqsf@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 23:41:19 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmwI-0009Xr-Gl for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 23:41:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmw4-0005DT-9e; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:41:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmw2-0005DL-O6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmw2-0004OH-F5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmw1-0002PW-SA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Daniel =?UTF-8?Q?Mart=C3=ADn?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61525 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61525-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61525.16765872599247 (code B ref 61525); Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61525) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Feb 2023 22:40:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37885 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmvy-0002P5-Rv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic314-20.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com ([77.238.177.146]:32956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pSmvx-0002Or-0z for 61525@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:40:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1676587251; bh=vOlU7MvHj8v8hBcunl7QuMHCDmqUf2+NoS9KoixZJTY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=IBRqxQW4fsiL+/oJWPFSax++GaxfKxId92c/NomM9wY0BMXxpr5tbv1v9Fwmw+vchuxMZqfXgDi1Xle1I6+5k54MUKodUXkbmI8qsdBw7wKstT9Sd1tD5xe2fSfwgaa9TQG2ufACtWaONlXaY9SE8NG1QeYERtg3kBNgs2HVpi24J0n5bAVtFXMsvVdM6Gs7PZhVQTA0w2mBB5agU1XPodozWetDBJOJuNZKJaiAjr2O0kRDT0w7I/6SOgWtzXk7+wR/aUVZYfaCt9cYhi6zFGrnb964vyxMoZng9TRozYhKwNJX52xN5ducn7rYLFCRjPlhMbbi9/q0yGBBVjq6Nw== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1676587251; bh=uGu5nnPO5uH+js4O7nfyknfMMlEbJ9v+4/OyOZdEuqz=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=YCjQu9IUfkVLtlSi6iLFTclnwKKOmfX7R2WvAb0tV3XRSnmvpf9n3u/ntl1pqh3H8RYy0WCIttBH69fyS0j5w3FGHGkYJw1kV4wbcIn+nyGw1uUqXT2LMPekbo9euhgjWZ8/bPjATFwbwranZfL0mmBDTMih6lv7suP/3lcLJpUJwpNjKYQ7RRVSwmLLmEP1PcE7VYrl1fBFWP9oDdCNZqZWn0uOocd/BJed+6FGx43OpHpX68H9pwWi+pRDay2aE06p3x6OPijRNbl/5lf8N53hlVk7uIjY2DfzpbDsjMgcfk1w+sqS3FQliF5m5D2RHHCup4xttNwqljpEFPIL5Q== X-YMail-OSG: MsCk1P4VM1kEaz8O4lnazaPJkELkHokNhDYc0InJzK2fn20pjWAQwAlO9LHsJby IE.RoE2L67in.zQXbbjUJlJ5j3VeuPVoems1UxWk2Pi3_v8sEqFh_ugKaROl.VAywfT7NG8QlOv5 e1B_O9GDxeT7td7eEhY4BAlVTXNT.mZwOBEqxedvRKAq_7eUOYLuhdPCK8zfMMivgx0lG7SAb8ce y2dA27JOaQppwjcZs9O4iDVQBFQC4asIl3vPLQAnDVQczM8saDQjGL2Y5KQLJMUV1YzeRIY5sjzC S1U4RBK7HdG5TgjDagQOK8o2BaP3L9I8ngFqvBzqfddhQF9YrO5s2FtX7zWMYeWyoJEFfO.QMfre frT5S6bzrR9r6vgfSeAxB25Tevdp0vX2QS0lgs2veux_OaHX4cuYQeM_59VAbONliIEHUEXhunIE TKpkt9zAugzDcE0jnExcrCcDxDvLDXUHJYTpGCmTPClPGLtjXoQVs6PmIHk77vkLBd98h8JbCP6c 2wA28W5DLUcaws7WK1slgNZyFlxfW9qXjxvVSDAnEoJmTfbMDoEYbzzOpJoeKAX4BooR7011p7et _SiDwkJLoIndUAeS4nsFTI.LdpOxsl6hh__Xo5Ju512Q_JV6OQXp_VLMy8SKduRcEVRpsrDec2vy Ho_d3Mpj7gwutbH2O4Pxl0scbJbvBTiOlh22M7AMtt72G9Rk8HjtLaXzXXV23JJeL7r18bkPkEcv eExJ.KBxvWMfEJIHpNrS94oQtwXx3DEQSn_YlDluTscah7x7jV6KVAqPKvT4li.2gchA5oaTRBK1 MTmmAtRF_.rasF1gTHN7Mu4AZcM0parNqkvtck59Ka X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic314.consmr.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:40:51 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-ir2-65c64dfd66-svnc4 (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID 38e7f84a68d4504f48f2a391ca59154f; Thu, 16 Feb 2023 22:40:48 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83k00i81zw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2023 10:10:11 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.21183 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:255842 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > > Does this include the behavior? That is, does that call behave the > same on all those versions? > I'd say yes, although as Apple software is non-free, it's difficult to be 100% sure. > > Did you try looking at Git history for this code? Maybe the log > messages of the relevant commits and/or bug reports and/or discussions > on emacs-devel around the dates of the commits tell something about > the reasons? I've seen too many cases where changing old code > introduced regressions because some aspect of the behavior was > disregarded, and would like to avoid that, certainly if this is for > the release branch. I'm OK to wait for if someone perhaps has a better idea to solve this issue. In any case, as the pretest is so close, I think that any change in the area should go to Emacs 30.