From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andrea Crotti Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: More emacs instances Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:51:40 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8762ze8w6k.fsf@mean.albasani.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281714753 20074 80.91.229.12 (13 Aug 2010 15:52:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:52:33 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 13 17:52:32 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjwYZ-0007Lm-UW for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:52:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35521 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjwYZ-0004vH-FT for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:52:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54005 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OjwXx-0004vC-Eg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:51:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjwXv-0006nH-ON for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:51:52 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjwXv-0006mq-J0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:51:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OjwXr-0006uC-Rg for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:51:47 +0200 Original-Received: from 88-111.eduroam.rwth-aachen.de ([134.61.88.111]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:51:47 +0200 Original-Received: from andrea.crotti.0 by 88-111.eduroam.rwth-aachen.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:51:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 32 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 88-111.eduroam.rwth-aachen.de User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5EbU8ygE2vb+K9PIsO7/MuiNosc= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:74617 Archived-At: Richard Riley writes: > > You can use gnus splitting if you like. I used to prefer that since its > all self contained in gnus then. > > That said I recently decided that, the devil you know, just to use gmail > filters configured via their web UI. I apply labels to emails e.g > "emacs-gnus" and then see them as separate IMAP folders (eg I see an > IMAP folder called "emacs-gnus") courtesy of offlineimap. > That's also an option right, labels are nice. I think procmail is really powerful though, even if it can be trickier to get it right. > > Yup. > > I did have local dovecot imap servers for a while, but I got confused > with multiple gmail account setup and so decided to keep it > simple. Also, the benefit of having local maildir is the wonderful > Mairix for indexing and searching! Well but then you can only access to the mails with the clients that can manipulate directly with Maildir format, and by the way during the time you're not syncing you don't see the new emails right? Is it gnus stable and fast on working on it? I trust more servers somehow... Is it offlineimap much slower than fetchmail that we have to run it much less often?