From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6027: 23.1.96; negative arg to pcomplete-arg broken Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:37:31 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1272110146 28661 80.91.229.12 (24 Apr 2010 11:55:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:55:46 +0000 (UTC) To: 6027@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 24 13:55:44 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dxS-0005j5-6i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 13:55:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5dxQ-0005qQ-PV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:55:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O5dxM-0005qF-Bj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53174 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5dxK-0005q1-Si for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:55:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dxI-0005ju-5x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:55:30 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43264) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dxI-0005jq-4H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dgQ-0006Qd-2f; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 6027 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.127210906424698 (code B ref -1); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Apr 2010 11:37:44 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dg7-0006QJ-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dg5-0006QD-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:34983) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dg2-00051U-VB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O5dg1-00036Y-VG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54328 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O5dg0-00036A-Se for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:37 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dfz-0003dx-Dp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ppsw-43.csi.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.8.143]:42256) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O5dfz-0003dc-8H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:37:35 -0400 X-Cam-AntiVirus: no malware found X-Cam-SpamDetails: not scanned X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ Original-Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.ntl.com ([86.9.122.85]:53225 helo=Victoria.local) by ppsw-43.csi.cam.ac.uk (smtp.hermes.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.156]:587) with esmtpsa (PLAIN:sl392) (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) id 1O5dfw-0006ho-FW (Exim 4.70) for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org (return-path ); Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:37:33 +0100 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 07:38:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:36469 Archived-At: Is pcomplete-arg broken? If the INDEX is negative, it always return nil (I examine this in a edebug process during which (pcomplete-arg 1) returns correct value). The body of the function does not seem to contain any code handling negative INDEX though the doc string however describes exact behaviour of negative INDEX. Thanks. Leo