From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help
Subject: Re: Tramp question
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:59:06 +0200
Message-ID: <m1r5fkzo5h.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m14oci1dag.fsf@gmail.com> <87mxqab2te.fsf@gmx.de>
	<m1zku9z0xk.fsf@gmail.com> <87bp6pou70.fsf@gmx.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1287601204 10022 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2010 19:00:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:00:04 +0000 (UTC)
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 20 21:00:03 2010
Return-path: <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1P8dtK-00088N-Ul
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:00:03 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35057 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1P8dtK-0007ih-Bp
	for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:00:02 -0400
Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42478 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P8dsj-0007hg-6c
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:59:26 -0400
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1P8dsh-0008CP-Nh
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:59:25 -0400
Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51035)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1P8dsh-0008C2-Gz
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:59:23 -0400
Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>) id 1P8dsd-0007xc-Ax
	for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:59:19 +0200
Original-Received: from ip-178-203-154-9.unitymediagroup.de ([178.203.154.9])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:59:19 +0200
Original-Received: from andrea.crotti.0 by ip-178-203-154-9.unitymediagroup.de with
	local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:59:19 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 13
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip-178-203-154-9.unitymediagroup.de
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (darwin)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:nDkY5BPGayu8uP2qPYpbdtRPspI=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3)
X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor <help-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs>
List-Post: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:help-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:75176
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.help/75176>

Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de> writes:
> No, I don't believe that's the reason.
>
> Anyway, I've checked the Emacs tree, and there are several dozen places
> where `shell-command-to-string' is called. I fear we cannot simply
> redefine its behaviour.
>
> Best regards, Michael.

Well no I didn't want to change everything, maybe sometimes it doesn't
make sense, even if I can't come up with an example now...
I just realized it when I tried to use "gtags-find-tag" and I saw it
didn't work...