From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8308: 23.3; Use utf-8 for writing abbrev file Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:37:41 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300723980 20061 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2011 16:13:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:13:00 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 17:12:55 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1his-0007qM-E1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 17:12:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1hir-0002wT-HQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:12:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51018 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1hdU-00088Z-6l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:07:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hdH-0006dz-RQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:07:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hdH-0006dh-MD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hC9-0002o6-LF; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:39:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:39:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8308 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.130072188910592 (code B ref -1); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:39:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2011 15:38:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hBH-0002kl-W4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hBF-0002k0-O1 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:38:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hB9-000775-Sl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:55615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hB9-00076u-Mz for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60905 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1hB7-0005HE-JO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:37:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hB6-00075f-9N for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:37:57 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hB6-00075V-1s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1hB4-0006SU-9s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:37:54 +0100 Original-Received: from th041135.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ([59.66.41.135]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:37:54 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by th041135.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:37:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: th041135.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (Mac OS X 10.6.6) Cancel-Lock: sha1:La848sBfd/Wzi0xVFsCW4zYxjDY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:39:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45231 Archived-At: On 2011-03-21 22:50 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Sounds good in general, but I'm wondering whether we should worry about > the presence of abbrevs which include bytes (aka eight-bit-chars). > Using `utf-8-emacs' should fix those issues, but would then bump into > the problem that such abbrev files wouldn't be compatible with Emacs-22. I think we should just use utf-8-emacs. What do other people think? Leo