From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: md5 and sha1 signatures Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 11:12:54 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306465992 29675 80.91.229.12 (27 May 2011 03:13:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 03:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 27 05:13:07 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QPnU3-0000nW-Ju for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 May 2011 05:13:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35338 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPnU2-0002W3-Q7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:13:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33602) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPnU0-0002VO-Ag for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPnTz-0007KO-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:13:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pv0-f169.google.com ([74.125.83.169]:32948) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QPnTz-0007KJ-Ij for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 May 2011 23:13:03 -0400 Original-Received: by pvc12 with SMTP id 12so712088pvc.0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=woOjMzgkzOVndiX7y4blmPLH6Nx+omOE545q/oNiu3s=; b=hM5D7Au3xQSaj7S2EPJXadKz9dOs8Asf/otyA8FiPFdrwF5yEptgckA6hATIXGJuqg b8CspRALUq6liA/F4CFNNHDI7GbmfKrwGafyi/pvihyIX5mcffNS5oS30EHF7MHA3FeE gcYcSHP+cn3BXla0rRc6vNBRsosM6OXYPM1zk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=WW6mIffTuJIBFy1WHgP8qevUtfpWx+khx/O70C8jqsBKJUkKKifNHtClgsMgwMGAyY LOtnvt/JdqFVGHiUROo5XoQCR/Za754A3Yqw0Lxc4wHNZUnD77S7vtVNUzHEI+BvmsKb 0Fw4Nkl49W8ei/jmIhLjEIdsGOk6XqYZYvvek= Original-Received: by 10.68.26.72 with SMTP id j8mr669239pbg.213.1306465982461; Thu, 26 May 2011 20:13:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Victoria.local ([123.114.55.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm132585pbj.9.2011.05.26.20.12.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 26 May 2011 20:13:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 26 May 2011 21:53:42 -0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.7) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.83.169 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139751 Archived-At: On 2011-05-27 08:53 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Since there is only one user of sha1's BINARY arg namely canlock-sha1 in >> the source tree, I wonder if it is worthwhile to make md5 and sha1 have >> similar signature: > >> (md5 OBJECT &optional START END CODING-SYSTEM NOERROR BINARY) >> (sha1 OBJECT &optional START END CODING-SYSTEM NOERROR BINARY) > >> What do you think? > > I don't think it's worth the trouble. > > > Stefan OK. Leo