From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11104: 24.0.94; (void-function make-local-hook): Update NEWS maybe? Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 20:38:31 +0800 Message-ID: References: <81zkb1kera.fsf@gmail.com> <87ehsdbyo0.fsf@altern.org> <87mx71t3wf.fsf@altern.org> <871uodt13b.fsf@altern.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332938395 21197 80.91.229.3 (28 Mar 2012 12:39:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:39:55 +0000 (UTC) To: 11104@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 28 14:39:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsAK-00037U-3Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:39:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57354 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsAJ-0007nU-CF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsAB-0007n3-FA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsA9-0004Z0-On for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:43 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35706) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsA9-0004Yv-LU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCseU-0005FP-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <81zkb1kera.fsf@gmail.com> Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11104 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: wontfix X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.133294022719989 (code B ref -1); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2012 13:10:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42538 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsdu-0005CH-It for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:10:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SCsds-0005C0-Nv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:10:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9R-0004SB-La for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]:53031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9R-0004S5-IS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9L-0007fv-Js for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:38:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9F-0004Q5-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:38:51 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35458) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9F-0004Px-7L for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:38:45 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SCs9C-0002EZ-W3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:38:42 +0200 Original-Received: from 111.194.110.177 ([111.194.110.177]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:38:42 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 111.194.110.177 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:38:42 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 6 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 111.194.110.177 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ftA8dCrCG31q4wPOPWcXt1bw1Eo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58234 Archived-At: On 2012-03-28 19:30 +0800, Bastien wrote: > Why? Check the documentation on the return value. Leo