From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#70589: [PATCH] Refine the Custom type of generated '*-modes' options Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86h6foz91p.fsf@gnu.org> <867cgjxpd8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eshel Yaron Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 70589@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 28 21:08:00 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sV-0005av-Lo for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 21:07:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sJ-0007n7-Cb; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:07:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sH-0007m8-Hy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sF-00005Z-MN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:07:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sZ-00067Q-6W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:08:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eshel Yaron Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:08:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 70589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 70589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B70589.171433127523492 (code B ref 70589); Sun, 28 Apr 2024 19:08:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 70589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Apr 2024 19:07:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52178 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sQ-00066q-JB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.eshelyaron.com ([107.175.124.16]:55400 helo=eshelyaron.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1s19sO-00066g-Op; Sun, 28 Apr 2024 15:07:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eshelyaron.com; s=mail; t=1714331252; bh=OurvjNHN5SQ3MbOnKZMGmOGU/+5atwXne4D2U0AANhc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=AcqzFW2CSq3f8sJ3wiBwf4WtmbEOg574b2I+RFHBf4YZHBoglN//JcD9Y7AEqc6FE TFBays6MRNGkNR61jeXpCcFz6/jaYhmf0n+IhKp1axrRPo3NhXgQMXv5z22jLqOtlX UF4iRf1DuN6CNYQG/pYtmbRK5BXbT9X8rysGncSL1CHuVfWcCuQ6kQOM/8DBXwsvRf F5PnCBS0V8P384vXq1f71mExL+qodgZIEKhj2IfnHTngkCVOoxK4fL2G+Ri+KUewby V8FWz3ZcUnaJd9i6xCbZ9UVPXasAA7V0+3fM2LxjJNXsEVLGWlFL/BlHX+4aVYbS7J palTE5NufQR3Q== In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 27 Apr 2024 17:03:05 -0400") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:284106 Archived-At: close 70589 30.1 quit Stefan Monnier writes: >>> Thanks, so I've now pushed it to master. I'm not closing the bug yet, >>> in favor of your additional suggestion below. >> Sorry, I mistakenly closed the bug nonetheless. Reopening. > > FWIW, I think we can close it: the bug was about improving the Custom > type and that's done. All right then, closing again :)