From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:07:53 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87sk0y1i18.fsf@catnip.gol.com> <7DEE67615141433C8FE87DBFE1DE88E8@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285427298 29974 80.91.229.12 (25 Sep 2010 15:08:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:08:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 25 17:08:17 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzWML-000477-3h for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:08:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40533 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzWMK-000255-1q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51302 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OzWMC-00024S-Kc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:08:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzWM8-000389-EB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzWM8-00037u-8q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 11:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzWM5-00040w-Og for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:08:01 +0200 Original-Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.9.122.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:08:01 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 17:08:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (Mac OS X 10.6.4) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LUR5sZrDq4qMiL1DibDdwnr7c20= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130850 Archived-At: On 2010-09-25 15:42 +0100, Drew Adams wrote: > +1 for remove-if(-not) > > But I don't know what you meant by TEST. > AFAIK, the CL signature is this: > > remove-if PREDICATE SEQ &key :from-end :start :end :count :key I think Miles was talking about making a new remove-if that accepts an optional argument, one that is not second class. Leo