From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8308: 23.3; Use utf-8 for writing abbrev file Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 18:01:17 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300702051 16215 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2011 10:07:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:07:31 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 11:07:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1c1D-0004Hm-89 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:07:23 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1c1C-0005ju-7P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:07:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42000 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1c0v-0005fJ-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:07:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1c0t-0006NQ-LL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1c0t-0006NL-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bw1-0008PT-QD; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:02:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8308 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.130070170932308 (code B ref -1); Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Mar 2011 10:01:49 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvo-0008P3-TU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvl-0008Oq-Pv for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvf-0005VP-GF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:40 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]:59608) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvf-0005VJ-Ag for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58264 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1bvd-0003uR-JN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:38 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvb-0005UU-OO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:40488) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvb-0005Tb-Dx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:01:35 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1bvZ-0001vv-53 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:33 +0100 Original-Received: from 114.249.16.245 ([114.249.16.245]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:33 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 114.249.16.245 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 11:01:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.249.16.245 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (Mac OS X 10.6.6) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0U0tbH4dq0ECDg2KGX8rZXqD+0s= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 06:02:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45221 Archived-At: On 2011-03-21 17:00 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Leo >> Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:22:24 +0800 >> Cc: >> >> Is it OK to change the encoding for abbrev file to utf-8? > > What will that do to characters that are not unified into the range of > valid Unicode code points? That's a valid concern. But ,---- | M -- emacs-mule | | Emacs 21 internal format used in buffer and string. | Type: emacs-mule (Emacs 21 internal encoding) | EOL type: Automatic selection from: | [emacs-mule-unix emacs-mule-dos emacs-mule-mac] | This coding system can encode all emacs-mule charsets. | | [back] `---- ,----[ (info "(elisp)Text Representations") ] | (1) This internal representation is based on one of the encodings | defined by the Unicode Standard, called "UTF-8", for representing any | Unicode codepoint, but Emacs extends UTF-8 to represent the additional | codepoints it uses for raw 8-bit bytes and characters not unified with | Unicode. `---- Would you agree to use utf-8-emacs instead, which covers all characters. > > Can you tell what is the purpose of this change? Make abbrev file editable to other editors. Leo