On 2013-11-18 23:20 +0800, martin rudalics wrote:
> I thought you intially wanted to fix the problem that a caller cannot
> handle a nil return value from `display-buffer'.  But Stefan says that
> it's not necessary to do that and I agree with him.  So your fix is OK
> but I'd just make the last line of `display-buffer' something like
>
> (when (windowp window) window)
>
> and you don't have to talk about a return value of t.  Returning t sounds
> not very intuitive when a function fails to accomplish something.

OK, thank you for the quick response. I have re-worked the patch based
on Stefan's and your comments. Please review it. Thanks.

Leo