From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Triska Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: something like linum.el ought to be added Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:17:10 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86hcm4rw70.fsf@macs.hw.ac.uk> <46E7AF2B.2000606@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1189602287 4944 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2007 13:04:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 12 15:04:43 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IVRtE-0001Z0-2t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 15:04:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVRtD-0006mz-Pu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:04:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVQHZ-0003T2-LB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:21:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IVQHW-0003Sg-Uw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IVQHW-0003Sd-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IVQHW-0002cC-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 Sep 2007 11:21:17 -0000 Original-Received: from chello062178240212.3.14.tuwien.teleweb.at (EHLO mt-computer.local) [62.178.240.212] by mail.gmx.net (mp001) with SMTP; 12 Sep 2007 13:21:17 +0200 X-Authenticated: #4064391 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/zuetYMDXz9XwPB1p0JYL4o74RRecsyqL75S1xrC DgmUG+Of8lRxPt X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 09:03:56 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:78672 Archived-At: martin rudalics writes: > seems to update line numbers twice when the same buffer is displayed in > more than one window. Changed in 0.9h. > Why do you want to update numbers on any but the selected frame > here? Because I found cases where the previous command created a frame with a buffer that must have its line numbers shown, yet was not selected. > Also, after scrolling it should be sufficient to consider the > scrolled window only. No: The scrolled window can use overlays that another window needs. > The `string-match' in `linum-after-change' should become > `string-match-p' to avoid clobbering match data. Changed.