From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: random 1 second delay in comint-redirect-results-list-from-process Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:04:54 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1371715516 16400 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2013 08:05:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 20 10:05:16 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UpZrn-00059H-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:05:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpZrm-0002et-QY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:05:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpZrf-0002bL-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:05:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpZrc-0001Bt-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:05:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]:33590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UpZrc-000199-4x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id kl14so6056199pab.20 for ; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:05:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=WJHFTX1cbkZCvaiJ/cVXCVtj442wnR+iTaXZhz3cN+s=; b=B39MJKE+ysY7L1FvnlmV2K9Nyidk9W4f6RqRrugl0j8mJEkZsfd/8qndcY/mTAfvYG kUdE5w7mkm1qcLPbtaqEyIGe9SYADv1knK3QgDG6T+cKjycDJ3MDtwznO003xQOYAi2B la87WO2aYKSl6lj+7vsEtDJsqADhJDzrGkPvxrd5hj/Ey2HwBgBxoWF2E29pjqaCvjF8 LY+GqWco9fI/Ik3ZJppsiej8k7fql/I89Zk+aaGZYTeMnrhTwIE8v9gxygGbVQyAHUmq zaYLTgzuyrgnrQEMXNIveWK2r8ogsZYrE2OB/mvWjxXI0rWrzLgtKygib+BY8sTyD6nY hnVw== X-Received: by 10.68.34.165 with SMTP id a5mr6344503pbj.156.1371715502998; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([182.48.101.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id iq2sm26776584pbb.19.2013.06.20.01.04.59 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2013 22:16:12 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:160732 Archived-At: On 2013-06-20 10:16 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > Rather than nil it should pass the actual process. Is it OK to apply the following patch? === modified file 'lisp/comint.el' --- lisp/comint.el 2013-05-25 02:40:33 +0000 +++ lisp/comint.el 2013-06-20 05:14:25 +0000 @@ -3726,7 +3726,7 @@ ;; Wait for the process to complete (set-buffer (process-buffer process)) (while (null comint-redirect-completed) - (accept-process-output nil 1)) + (accept-process-output process)) ;; Collect the output (set-buffer output-buffer) (goto-char (point-min))