From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [roland.winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de: documentation bug: customization type `option'] Date: 09 Jul 2004 14:02:31 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <871xjuojfl.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1089396212 17464 80.91.224.253 (9 Jul 2004 18:03:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 18:03:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 09 20:03:21 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiziS-00024N-00 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:03:20 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BiziS-0006Nk-00 for ; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 20:03:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bizkd-0000NG-Gf for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:05:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BizkU-0000N7-Ay for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BizkS-0000Mo-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:05:26 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BizkS-0000Ml-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.165] (helo=simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bizhg-0001aS-Lv; Fri, 09 Jul 2004 14:02:32 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.local ([67.71.26.120]) by simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040709180143.TTSD18206.simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.local>; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:01:43 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.local (Postfix, from userid 502) id D7BB124ED02; Fri, 9 Jul 2004 14:02:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: David Kastrup In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25561 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25561 > As a language feature, "lazy" is the most often used word as in "lazy > evaluation". Scheme also has the noun "continuation" for what > amounts to an implementation of the concept. No, continuations are something entirely different. Scheme's operations to handle laziness are "delay" and "force". Stefan