From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:25:09 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <417AA9D8.6080600@wyrdrune.com> <417CC0B9.3030901@wyrdrune.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098707198 2259 80.91.229.6 (25 Oct 2004 12:26:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 12:26:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guy Gascoigne-Piggford , Lennart Borgman , Jason Rumney , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 14:26:26 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CM3ve-0007bo-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:26:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM43I-0007qU-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:34:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CM435-0007pv-KP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CM435-0007pc-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:34:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CM434-0007pZ-Tw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.165] (helo=simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CM3uQ-0001pX-Lr; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.71.35.140]) by simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041025122509.MAWX1960.simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:25:09 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id A180133C366; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 08:25:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:06:42 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28899 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28899 >> Better to let the OS choose the port and >> then store it in a file that emacsclient can read. At that point, adding >> a secret random key to it isn't that much extra work. > Don't you need to add support for that random key to the protocol ? Yes, it's the "extra work" I was referring to. Stefan