From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: All platforms fail with Unicode in menus. Date: 28 Aug 2004 18:38:58 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <412E2C34.8070905@swipnet.se> <36EB2786-F940-11D8-A79B-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093732770 21620 80.91.224.253 (28 Aug 2004 22:39:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 22:39:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: reiner.steib@gmx.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 29 00:39:19 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C1Bqx-0007D8-00 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 2004 00:39:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1Bvg-00036F-Sk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:44:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C1BvT-000356-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:43:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C1BvR-00034H-VQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:43:58 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C1BvR-00033n-Hd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:43:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.141] (helo=simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C1Bqf-0005E8-Rd; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada-wifi.home ([67.68.218.80]) by simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040828223807.VHQH1580.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada-wifi.home>; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:38:07 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada-wifi.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 02F7C2B0CB7; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 18:38:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: "Jan D." In-Reply-To: <36EB2786-F940-11D8-A79B-000D93505B76@swipnet.se> Original-Lines: 20 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26598 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26598 > I don't know what system David originally used, but I used GNU/Linux on x86, > with gcc 3.4.1. OK, so GCPROs won't help. > If the GCPROs don't help, can for example static Lisp_Object:s be the source > of this problem? Yes, very much so. You need to `staticpro' them. > Are there any other cases where Lisp_Object:s should be protected? Well, Lisp_Objects in the stack are protected by stack scanning or GCPRO, Lisp_Objects in the static area are protected by staticpro, and Lisp_Objects in the heap are protected by tracing, so you should make sure that any Lisp_Objects in the heap are properly traced (typically, that means that they are properly handled by mark_object). Stefan