From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs and Guile Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 07:06:19 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87k41ofsl8.fsf@gnu.org> <87d37p1o7u.fsf@gmail.com> <83ehrw6p26.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334099207 29365 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2012 23:06:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:06:47 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 11 01:06:46 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk96-00036P-Tu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:06:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47446 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk96-00013n-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46005) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk93-00013Z-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:06:43 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk92-00086E-5I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk91-00086A-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:06:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SHk8x-00032Z-TA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:06:35 +0200 Original-Received: from 222.130.135.83 ([222.130.135.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:06:35 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 222.130.135.83 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:06:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 222.130.135.83 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAMFBMVEUaFRZLMy1dTENxVzKQ WiCrXQ97cmO/dSqSh3akjGTApXy5sJ7Sxo/Sz8Xo6eP9//xJbkruAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlw SFlzAAACxQAAAsUBidZ/7wAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMJOwHXewoAAAIBSURBVCjPVdNBiNNAFADQ6J4F x3hThHZBBC+WCFI8SS0iezRDcMHLHkLAg6gJH/fgYQ9xYlj2sLK4KHgqCgXFhda2Idmr4kkQPZQ0 nkQMbTypbMmMM2m7ZgYSmMef/5OZPwo7HFnx3uKPcmj0Dht1LWZJ+Hvr7dIFZXRUwl9VRTuuKDJ+ U44gjscknK4hhJaCkYRsWjmBtLqXlJAG2wipNe18OZJu1BBq1E8xafl4s6Jq2mUZGftU1y7CCxnp FVUDWJXx4C66BKBnErbuoaYNtoRTu6EZBsCbMn7W+5qOAR6WvxNOby9jHWC9hAf3n304CdiAByXs 3Nh9roLDkyb/sWV712vYwaLSAn8CPMHIAAzOPDKP2COAFm4Y4ODVWc6xG7KXsN7UeUJjjimx2uwd gCgNhr0i8C/xyCD5CiCKAMY3Bf5oDzx//w/fimscdcAZU2jv9sedx6+nYPPFIoWI/GK6QZ+EFGOR ErAjCnV3vPZ7XqlTIMbOLY7fLcvvmT7rXNWaGDexIY44N12TG2PDp7vqyl57dnCeuWwyNpnEURxk fTbDYeBnKRn4oejPYI4sH6WviBumEZ/GxX4X/x6EcURFZ7E071bjQGAxpcOAEOJuTiroDEea5Szv rVWLYfl7ZiQwSUToxrkux7OLixAWGz22+HIyWTRYcVfomOwvzusfjtVIGgLHf3MAAAAASUVORK5C YII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wzpz5Quw3AyGETilbxDqqDdxYTo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:149583 Archived-At: On 2012-04-10 15:09 +0800, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > FWIW, my (admittedly short) experience with Guile is that it is not > reliable or stable on anything but GNU/Linux, and even there it has > much to catch up. It has a lot to gain in terms of portability before > it can be considered seriously as an alternative to ELisp, or even its > sibling on equal rights. > > As an example, look at the series of reports from my (eventually > successful) attempt to build Guile natively on MS-Windows. The series > starts here: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2012-01/msg00034.html Indeed, these are some disheartening signs. But I hope they will improve/mature once guile is used in more places. Leo