From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11606: 24.1; Get rid of buffer local hook variables in find-file.el Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 12:05:56 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1338696440 29498 80.91.229.3 (3 Jun 2012 04:07:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2012 04:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11606@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 03 06:07:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb261-0007uZ-HW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 06:07:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57681 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb261-0001zF-2g for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:07:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46090) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb25y-0001z8-J3 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:07:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb25w-0002Xn-Ux for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:07:14 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45615) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb25w-0002Xi-Oz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:07:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb27h-00006j-In for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:09:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:09:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11606 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11606-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11606.1338696485349 (code B ref 11606); Sun, 03 Jun 2012 04:09:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11606) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jun 2012 04:08:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb26m-00005a-Cs for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com ([209.85.160.44]:49249) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sb26l-000056-FI for 11606@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jun 2012 00:08:04 -0400 Original-Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so4239461pbc.3 for <11606@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:06:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=SdEc8hQiPwEKS9smMELnxZIQrKos8lp8TnI5t7brXxM=; b=CMqrMuJjEdcZ69bOydahw2botZ5pCQbn3MU6y3R7fxAcBi30IlzoYCED+xIersUVkw HKd87D0fPCWA3jATwSpjRTjapqLW0RkNHhfvyN8tE7kOw9+nmSK3d+to1lPZb3RjbqBY OqFb3WRugmcBtGlm0SYfTMoT1MlFZMSZ9yl2keiEoGe0zRdQ4miFwobqDh6AYPRJx1Xw r362U6UBuJ9/64p4gFaCmXFOb0f5hbHgK4l+53c3bLC8RdkVwwY9huTDtNpeLrNbJL1k aFX1vMphNvprb7e5/YunYDPa3By9RsLRuie39x7R2AEsiu5mR/CwTxwyVdad7H0iBCO6 fxXw== Original-Received: by 10.68.201.9 with SMTP id jw9mr17667308pbc.28.1338696368570; Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([221.219.116.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ip5sm8402007pbc.3.2012.06.02.21.06.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 02 Jun 2012 21:06:08 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 02 Jun 2012 23:18:15 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:60651 Archived-At: On 2012-06-03 11:18 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > I also like removing those, but I still don't know why you think these > can be removed safely. I was thinking that add-hook supports adding local hooks which might be better than making those hooks buffer-local. What are your concerns about their safety? Leo