From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: return Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 06:49:33 +0000 Message-ID: References: <201011261019.20727.tassilo@member.fsf.org> <87bp52xdqw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291445389 24590 80.91.229.12 (4 Dec 2010 06:49:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 06:49:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Tassilo Horn , Fren Zeee , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 04 07:49:45 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1POlwG-0004We-SV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 07:49:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40503 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POlwG-000385-Dk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:49:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=40525 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1POlwA-00037z-TI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:49:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POlw9-00022N-SX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:49:38 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:38597) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1POlw9-00022F-JY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2010 01:49:37 -0500 Original-Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so1925719wwi.0 for ; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:49:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=q3RaJ+VLORKDYjZqnKhved7q4N9cZu9F2mH9kX4Gzss=; b=tpmhJ1oyXpS8u8qaQismbUS5HvPdEO4/fhc0yqcSXKdVhrxRepiYW6cDuJwMQT52JM VNDhWZPh5nr0bCjFCqAoRzlTuI1DbyejVgvBz9agBsjswrWO7NxtOH1tH0m8mqv2gWgV wEnya7zgOuhTCnAP4TIasS6PVVNp1cj7wwIv8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=KgGLx/jqmtWlFvixHkZxCotbKsgRT4/G7T1D5oBwZc0kQ1x+EZk8mF4Ct3GUvOPCL+ 0TIk9afsWjt5zdA1sfWadKSFx6p2PsiApNI+1gtuRs+ACt6SlR+0LBW0Lt5XvaGoUWtk Ryvtby/GYXjHk5voM6SS8n8Thty+G8d9XTLC8= Original-Received: by 10.227.129.71 with SMTP id n7mr2934289wbs.128.1291445376572; Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:49:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Victoria.local (cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [86.9.122.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm1831851wbc.3.2010.12.03.22.49.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 03 Dec 2010 22:49:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87bp52xdqw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Sat, 04 Dec 2010 15:18:15 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.90 (Mac OS X 10.6.5) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:133395 Archived-At: On 2010-12-04 06:18 +0000, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > A better question might be "why not build elisp on top of a more > efficient extension language?" That would be many people's dream comes true. Looks like guile has already implemented elisp. I wonder if the work to move emacs over guile will take off after guile 2.0. Cheers, Leo