From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs core TLS support Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 20:20:20 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878wc1vfh3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r5ptpnz2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871vhsvkut.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87d41csktn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87k4v0n0m8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrrvfnc4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vd7ed0sb.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1281813926 8988 80.91.229.12 (14 Aug 2010 19:25:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2010 19:25:26 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 14 21:25:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkMM5-0007St-W9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:25:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44449 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkMM5-0006g5-EB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46802 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OkMLv-0006bW-LL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:25:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkMLq-000056-S2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:25:11 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:49923) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkMLq-00004v-JD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:25:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OkMLn-0007JL-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:25:03 +0200 Original-Received: from cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.9.122.85]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:25:03 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:25:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc1-cmbg13-0-0-cust596.cmbg.cable.virginmedia.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (Mac OS X 10.6.4) Cancel-Lock: sha1:2ivrepVGLc9juxIFxk+Ov81+vsY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:128703 Archived-At: On 2010-08-13 15:50 +0100, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > L> BTW, I remembered seeing rms OK the ffi feature. I wonder if > L> there's a plan for this. It would open up a new world of > L> applications for emacs. For example, at the moment emacs lacks a > L> (good) English grammar checker. > > I would not want SSL support to be pluggable :) But yes, I think > generally it will make Emacs much better to have binary extensions. I am glad this is receiving more attention ;) Regards, Leo