From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: pcomplete-suffix-list is obsolete? Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 23:16:02 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349709390 15944 80.91.229.3 (8 Oct 2012 15:16:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 15:16:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 08 17:16:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF4N-0002xo-C9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43726 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF4H-000134-7X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:16:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60080) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF45-00012m-Ks for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:16:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF44-00038x-7g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:16:17 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36270) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF44-00037l-1F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:16:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TLF47-0002o5-2S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:19 +0200 Original-Received: from 182.48.109.8 ([182.48.109.8]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:19 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 182.48.109.8 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:16:19 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 10 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 182.48.109.8 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (OS X 10.8.2) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ytn2tB6nU8qAzl7thnRThaYPr4U= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154239 Archived-At: On 2012-09-26 21:03 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > The completion table should say that the result is not the end of > the story. Usually this happens because the `completion-boundaries' of > the text after completion is not the same as the one before > completion, IIRC. We should definitely document this better. So what is 'boundary' in the context of completion? I cannot find any explanation. Leo