Re: [POLL] Dealing with +1m/y repeaters when jumping to impossible date (should 05-31 +1m be 07-01 or 06-30?)

[Stefan Nobis <stefan-ml@snobis.de>]

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> +1m! is awkward - what if [2024-05-12 +1m!]?

You are right. I have not really spent time to think about a nice
syntax. But I think it needs to be encoded in the increment part, not
in the date part (because after the first increment, the information
that we want the last day of each month would be lost; and always
using yyyy-(mm+1)--1 also seems a bit awkward).

So maybe "+1mx" or some other way to encode "go to last day of next
month" directly into the increment?

-- 
Until the next mail...,
Stefan.