From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5937: 23.1.95; why saving empty abbrev tables Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:26:43 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301323056 21016 80.91.229.12 (28 Mar 2011 14:37:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 5937@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 28 16:37:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DZR-0006MD-6X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:37:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34882 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4DZQ-0001AT-75 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:37:28 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52040 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q4DZE-00016e-Qr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:37:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DZC-0006nk-Sx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:37:15 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54767) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DZC-0006ne-Qq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DQI-000638-3L; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Leo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 5937 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5937-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5937.130132243323199 (code B ref 5937); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 14:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5937) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Mar 2011 14:27:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DPV-000628-EN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:27:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q4DPT-00061v-NG for 5937@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:27:12 -0400 Original-Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1131091gxk.3 for <5937@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:27:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=5NZLoz6WOZ/KYLKJ5I+mK3d36EEpOcbkV3X+DI53oYc=; b=kCC6cTDmwH7Vo02SY8CrASjOW282hrhLUNsT13Udd49CzD2ut20T/cqLwFDMFXLSkq o/PEwTQy4rkmzkuDi/x3tLaTozv+xQ6hgkgX+0ge272iRATIvht3W1DivC7ubIBO4XzS OTq58JLOzvEywpFXrCEKqlLsS8XIOWZ8JNZu8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=MuervJqu8Jqe7r1Xxb6+iTmrRzPHVc9fyBO4RvuGMvJLQgvPvAbZVfoHFX5Js6OU3D VtruTqr/FTiUWx8s/bqifKiHUdxzDsLwS2W6X0LKxL43dqNUmGohKKETR9TqHl9b3qC4 1mCgho2kRmSY7sSEFfWhdnTLwKrDftYp4fyRA= Original-Received: by 10.42.239.74 with SMTP id kv10mr246542icb.402.1301322415857; Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:26:55 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Victoria.local (th041112.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn [59.66.41.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm2983317iby.48.2011.03.28.07.26.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:26:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 28 Mar 2011 09:58:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.7) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:28:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45421 Archived-At: On 2011-03-28 21:58 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > write-abbrev-file may be called from a non-"edit-abbrevs" buffer > (e.g. from save-some-buffer), so I think that calling > edit-abbrevs-redefine from it is problematic. Is there a particular > reason why you put the call to edit-abbrevs-redefine in > write-abbrev-file rather than in abbrev-save-buffer. Good point. I missed it. I want C-x C-w to also redefine the abbrevs if it is called in that editing buffer. Do you mind if I do something like the following in write-abbrev-file: (and (derived-mode-p 'edit-abbrevs-mode) (edit-abbrevs-redefine)) Leo -- Oracle is the new evil