From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fix for bug 10994 breaks ido customizations in major way Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 09:52:11 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87txmfyb9n.fsf@gmail.com> <432AFE3B3321498E9B17075D3B55A60B@us.oracle.com> <87y5bqty1w.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqrar2g9.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87mws5sxax.fsf@gmail.com> <877gj9p779.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1368150756 9867 80.91.229.3 (10 May 2013 01:52:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 01:52:36 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 10 03:52:35 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVc-0008Vw-UA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:52:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49472 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVc-00076e-Ga for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:52:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36030) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVZ-00076Z-7V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:52:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVY-0006pA-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:52:29 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVY-0006oi-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 May 2013 21:52:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UacVV-0008NM-70 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from li511-224.members.linode.com ([66.175.216.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:52:25 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by li511-224.members.linode.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2013 03:52:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: li511-224.members.linode.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9F28Mlwj1FDZUUoHuziwHSVrb6g= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159462 Archived-At: On 2013-05-09 04:56 +0800, Juri Linkov wrote: > Since you intended to make `delete-consecutive-dups' destructive, > wouldn't it be more efficient to use `setcdr' like in `delete-dups'? > > Then it could be also used for a new possible value of the option > `history-delete-duplicates' to delete consecutive elements from the history. Yes for efficiency it could destructively modify the list in-place. ido needs non-destructive so I am keeping it as ido-remove-consecutive-dups for now. Leo