From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Achim Gratz Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should we use =?utf-8?b?YHN5bWJvbCc=?= or 'symbol' in Emacs change logs? Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 06:43:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <871tvczf1l.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87fvjsgzo0.fsf@Rainer.invalid> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401432273 5626 80.91.229.3 (30 May 2014 06:44:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 06:44:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 30 08:44:25 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGYD-0006Sl-42 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:44:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51697 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGYA-0003Sj-Ow for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42297) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGY2-0003Rr-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGXw-00009F-DL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:44:14 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGXw-00008z-6I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 02:44:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WqGXv-0006CT-2a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:44:07 +0200 Original-Received: from 217.10.52.10 ([217.10.52.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:44:07 +0200 Original-Received: from Stromeko by 217.10.52.10 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 30 May 2014 08:44:07 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 217.10.52.10 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172190 Archived-At: Glenn Morris gnu.org> writes: > > Then you might want to document it somewhere > > Bam, done in trunk r117195. Thanks. > (Personally I think "every existing ChangeLog in Emacs" was > documentation enough.) If that was indeed so clear cut, I wouldn't have asked. Regards, Achim.