From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding packages to enable by default Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8761ra7uq3.fsf@yandex.ru> <6c891113-22b0-4f3d-afc9-a735548efbbb@default> <762bef11-2366-4b7e-909a-ce1a7805d648@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386099170 10761 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2013 19:32:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 19:32:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 20:32:55 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnviH-00032r-T3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:32:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44535 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnviH-00070C-HH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:32:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnviB-0006zw-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:32:51 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnvi6-0003ba-2j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:32:47 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnvi5-0003bU-Sb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 14:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnvi2-0002vk-RX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:32:38 +0100 Original-Received: from 94-21-76-206.pool.digikabel.hu ([94.21.76.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:32:38 +0100 Original-Received: from adatgyujto by 94-21-76-206.pool.digikabel.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 20:32:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 94.21.76.206 (Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166050 Archived-At: Drew Adams oracle.com> writes: > > Sounds like you think that the data gathered this way is in fact > a representative sample, at least wrt most of the features reported. > > You might be right, but why do you think so? > Because these are the exact packages I see coming up again and again when reading emacs forums. From the top ones I see ido, recentf, yasnippet, etc. discussed very frequently. But I agree the data is not representative, so it's only my suspicion (based on my personal observations) that these are really popular packages.