From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding packages to enable by default Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8761ra7uq3.fsf@yandex.ru> <6c891113-22b0-4f3d-afc9-a735548efbbb@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386095443 30569 80.91.229.3 (3 Dec 2013 18:30:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 18:30:43 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 03 19:30:50 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnukA-0002bw-2E for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:30:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnuk9-0007pb-Ih for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:30:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnujx-0007oA-VG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:30:39 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnujs-00089t-JO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:30:33 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnujs-00089m-Cy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 13:30:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vnujq-0002Q3-U2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:30:27 +0100 Original-Received: from 94-21-76-206.pool.digikabel.hu ([94.21.76.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:30:26 +0100 Original-Received: from adatgyujto by 94-21-76-206.pool.digikabel.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Dec 2013 19:30:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 94.21.76.206 (Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166048 Archived-At: Drew Adams oracle.com> writes: > > > We have the list of features enabled in user configs compiled > > from the bug reports. > > Which does not include any reports where users remove such info, > for whatever reasons (privacy concerns, irrelevant to the report, > verbosity/noise, whatever). I indicated the same thing in my last paragraph saying this test should be repeated with more representative data. (Collecting the value of 'features from users with a fully configured emacs.) So it's obvious the data is not sufficient, but I suspect we'll see most of these packages among the top ones again if more data is collected.