From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?b?SsOpcsOpbXk=?= Compostella Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: other-buffer advice on kill-buffer Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <8662mgg2ea.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1312286336 31071 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2011 11:58:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2011 11:58:56 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 02 13:58:53 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcY-0008GX-OM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:58:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43057 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcY-0007JR-6D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:58:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47007) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcV-0007JM-Ll for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:58:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcU-00019m-NB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:58:47 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:36473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcU-00019f-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 07:58:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QoDcT-0008Dj-3A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:58:45 +0200 Original-Received: from irdmzpr01-ext.ir.intel.com ([192.198.151.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:58:45 +0200 Original-Received: from jeremy.compostella by irdmzpr01-ext.ir.intel.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:58:45 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 29 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 192.198.151.36 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110422 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.17) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:142688 Archived-At: Alp Aker gmail.com> writes: > > Tim Cross wrote: > > > From memory, you cannot advise functions implemented in C, only those > > implemented in elisp. > > That's not correct. You can advise a primitive function, but the advice will > only affect calls to that function made from Lisp, not calls from other > primitives. Reading emacs source code let met think that way. Thanks you for confirming my understanding. > Jérémy Compostella wrote: > > >> I have tried to advice the other-buffer function which seems called > >> (Cf. buffer.c) but my advice is never called in this case. Indeed, my > >> other-buffer advice is correctly called on switch-to-buffer call but > >> never on kill-buffer call. > > Are you sure your advice on other-buffer is being called when > switch-to-buffer is called? That shouldn't be possible, as switch-to-buffer > is a primitive, like kill-buffer; neither should see your advice. Indeed, I did not understand why it was possible in that case. I finally figure out that actually my switch-to-buffer was bound to iswitchb-buffer which lisp implemented. My mistake. Thanks.