From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alp Aker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 23 branch NS build failure - XVECTOR->size / nsmenu Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308170129 32686 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2011 20:35:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:35:29 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 22:35:26 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWwo9-0006ry-JL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 22:35:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54239 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWwo8-0004U5-Jh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:35:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:59206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWvmo-0002TL-6K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWvmm-0003OV-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:58 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51280) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWvmm-0003OP-IM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:29:56 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWvmk-00058z-UP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:29:54 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-72-95-250-103.pitbpa.east.verizon.net ([72.95.250.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:29:54 +0200 Original-Received: from alp.tekin.aker by pool-72-95-250-103.pitbpa.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 21:29:54 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 72.95.250.103 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_5) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.77 Safari/534.24) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140514 Archived-At: > Personally I don't see any point in applying it until/unless it's > confirmed there will be another release from emacs-23. But wouldn't it be unfortunate to leave emacs-23 in a state in which it won't even compile on NS?