From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alp Aker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a unicode footnote style? (encoding fixed) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:10:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <83oc3djmda.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4e1jesg.fsf@gnu.org> <83bozcjqu9.fsf@gnu.org> <874o53g9xv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k4dzj1vo.fsf@gnu.org> <87iptjetd4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83hb93iz9n.fsf@gnu.org> <83ei47iy0d.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304964654 31649 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 18:10:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:10:54 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 20:10:50 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUus-00078D-W5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:10:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41021 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUus-0007RU-8Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:10:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUuq-0007RE-2o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUuo-0004b8-9n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:10:44 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38396) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUuo-0004aq-2t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 14:10:42 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUum-000779-Rm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:10:40 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net ([71.182.163.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:10:40 +0200 Original-Received: from aker by pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:10:40 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.182.163.252 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.57 Safari/534.24) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139292 Archived-At: > > I don't think you're right here. A (raise 0.5) display spec on NextStep > > increases the line height, and does nothing else. It doesn't change the > > vertical position of the character relative to the baseline. > > Maybe it's a bug in NextStep, then. The implementation is in xdisp.c, > at least most of it. On a quick glance, it looks like the problem is with the glyph rendering in nsterm.m. ns_draw_glyphs_foreground doesn't check s->ybase when deciding where to position the glyph, so it's essentially just discarding some of the information from the `raise' display spec that's processed by fill_composite_glyph_string.