From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alp Aker Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding a unicode footnote style? (encoding fixed) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <83oc3djmda.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4e1jesg.fsf@gnu.org> <83bozcjqu9.fsf@gnu.org> <874o53g9xv.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83k4dzj1vo.fsf@gnu.org> <87iptjetd4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83hb93iz9n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304961777 14244 80.91.229.12 (9 May 2011 17:22:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 17:22:57 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 09 19:22:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAU-0007PR-97 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:22:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAT-0004ZF-O2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:22:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58172) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAR-0004Z7-OY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:22:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAQ-0003xK-Q4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:22:47 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:38903) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAQ-0003xE-Jp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:22:46 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QJUAJ-0007J4-0u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:22:39 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net ([71.182.163.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:22:39 +0200 Original-Received: from aker by pool-71-182-163-252.pitbpa.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 19:22:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.182.163.252 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/11.0.696.57 Safari/534.24) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139285 Archived-At: > AFAIK, what you see on NextStep is how it works on _any_ GUI display. > The implementation is device-independent. Making the digit smaller > (with `height', as I show in my other message) alleviates the effect > on the line height to some degree. I don't think you're right here. A (raise 0.5) display spec on NextStep increases the line height, and does nothing else. It doesn't change the vertical position of the character relative to the baseline.