From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Fran Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs says: xrandr unavailable, simulating -nw Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4C400B91.8050907@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279290218 13882 80.91.229.12 (16 Jul 2010 14:23:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 14:23:38 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 16 16:23:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZloz-0001Xu-PC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:23:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZlor-0001k1-UX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:23:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38651 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OZlkF-0007rN-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:18:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZlkA-0003jm-FN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:18:31 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:57384) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZlkA-0003jN-8l for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 10:18:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OZlk8-0007Zt-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from 128-221-197-57.emc.com ([128.221.197.57]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from flitterio by 128-221-197-57.emc.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:18:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 128.221.197.57 (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127435 Archived-At: Jan Djärv writes: > Fran skrev 2010-07-15 21.55: > > I just built the latest dev sources on SLES11 Linux, and when I run Emacs it > > says: > > > > Display :1.0 xrandr unavailable, simulating -nw > > > > and sure enough, it starts as if I had specified the -nw option (though I > > didn't). > No. What does xdpyinfo say? Does it list xrandr? Actually, my DISPLAY environment variable somehow had the value ":1.0 xrandr" when it should have been ":2.0". Changing it fixed the problem. I have no idea how that happened. -- Fran