From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Seweryn Kokot Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How modify numbers in a region by a multiplier? Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:40:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87pqz53g34.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1278337252 9314 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2010 13:40:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:40:52 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 05 15:40:51 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVlul-0007mS-23 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:40:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVluk-0000Aa-8C for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:40:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=45893 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OVluJ-00009b-R3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:40:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVluI-0003fK-S0 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:40:23 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVluI-0003ex-Km for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 09:40:22 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OVluD-0007ZN-SX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:40:17 +0200 Original-Received: from 139.191.131.39 ([139.191.131.39]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:40:17 +0200 Original-Received: from sewkokot by 139.191.131.39 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:40:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 139.191.131.39 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.5; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:74073 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero gmail.com> writes: > > Can we say that the second > > version is more elispy (more elegant and safer) than the first one? > > That is hard to say; different tastes, etc. > > I personally would write it like this: ... > > but that does *not* mean that it is more elegant or lispy; just more > to my tastes Thank you Juanma for your opinion. Nice to have another version of the function :-)