From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: William Xu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Does emacs 22.2 support compiled as 64bit? Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:24:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20080421212423.3899F8FC6D@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1208834788 4888 80.91.229.12 (22 Apr 2008 03:26:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:26:28 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 22 05:27:03 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Jo99g-00068N-24 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:27:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo98q-00043A-SM for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo98T-00042a-TU for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:25:37 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo98J-00041R-SJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:25:36 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo98J-00041K-IJ for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Jo98H-0004FL-1z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Apr 2008 23:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Jo97Q-0003sK-4M for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:24:32 +0000 Original-Received: from KD125052252076.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp ([125.52.252.76]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:24:32 +0000 Original-Received: from william.xwl by KD125052252076.ppp-bb.dion.ne.jp with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2008 03:24:32 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 125.52.252.76 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10_5_2; zh-cn) AppleWebKit/525.18 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/3.1.1 Safari/525.18) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:53463 Archived-At: Nick Roberts snap.net.nz> writes: > > Your 7.5Mb attachment takes about 20 minutes to receive on dialup and > is not > of interest to most subscribers. Messages posted to this list are generally > no longer than 100kB. If attachments are larger than this then you can > upload > them somewhere and point to an URL. Please show some consideration for > others. Sorry, as it responds very fast(i send mail through postfix at background), i didn't realize this problem. I'm going to repeat the body part here, excluding the attachments: Peter Dyballa Web.DE> writes: > Now try to preprocess with -E (and -dD, that macros get defined) the > same file, once in 32-bit mood, once in 64-bit mood. With -o you can > send GCC's output to a file, or with >. Then compare the two pre- > processed files. The difference should give an explanation why in 64- > bit mode CInfoPBRec stays undefined. It might be an Apple bug ... The outputs are too big... around 3M to 4M, as in attachments. And there are too many differences. [see my last post for the attachments]