From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Holger Sparr Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: pasting many times Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:03:38 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20061023161409.GH12474@radix50.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1161672039 32187 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2006 06:40:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 06:40:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 24 08:40:35 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcFxc-0002Zd-Hy for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:40:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GcFxc-0005Ru-5d for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 24 Oct 2006 02:40:28 -0400 Original-Path: shelby.stanford.edu!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!news.dfncis.de!not-for-mail Original-Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.help Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Trace: news.dfncis.de zRwRGxIvThQE6sCW6QZR0wECDrCLHWn0ETwx2JGeTDOG6D Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dBAYiGa2Fo1jBViAYDOXobUOzRU= Original-Xref: shelby.stanford.edu gnu.emacs.help:142610 Original-To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:38231 Archived-At: On Mon, 23 Oct 2006, Dieter Wilhelm wrote: >>> 59p > >> Thanks, good to know! Five keystrokes instead of nine. However, IIRC, > > We would need some modifier keys as well and this would result in at > least 7 keystrokes unfortunately. > I'd suggest a function key for this. Holger