From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Heime Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Regexp with comment character of buffer Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 12:36:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5my4_hPxAvHxrSRXBqG0sOdSxA9OXe9rRX9fl7efeXWgi5h6EAw4Oh3a7VllRQNz6URMUcjIPkRcOGMn6RCYxbF0Au7lTb2BCkm4ffPuv3A=@protonmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33837"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Heime via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor To: Yuri Khan Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 14:37:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sdUIY-0008ab-BI for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 14:37:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdUI5-0005DL-In; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:36:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdUHw-0005Cm-Jx for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:36:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch ([185.70.40.132]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sdUHt-0007mf-Gl for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:36:40 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1723466190; x=1723725390; bh=6IzYoZMp+RH7VOjJrpFGJ9UmtlsHvLB5iPNnEN0ccUk=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=bOZQTjiFsEIu/bwxVsUKNcBxwUIUHB4VH8ifdTzlfC8YekfedQ1431V+A2ob5EDdL wd8+vFbV7bnkx4h7ngvjbjYK++1TQq+lIVkh8wxgHdT5pZo2yrEXmKye/dR3QBWtVs t/gij8Gr+sB0onCqcEcvtVUHXMsJ0GlSJr714CC8BeAE8mdXk+sSDw9uVmtjP/Gufe FAwI7FIC8b8VGgRNomGpo4VMdiomXx9ySKhIpvPP36YtHw8ELgiyVCuZe3pI6nCBc3 YXDhCe88CbW+R15/YP2qPsyLDQkQju0v96tmurZHjkv41ebsiJN9dpER1oohtXPh6O vN5axxgQ7+4+A== In-Reply-To: Feedback-ID: 57735886:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 7d9b982e2ed31fc44010d4b40487b458ff164441 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.70.40.132; envelope-from=heimeborgia@protonmail.com; helo=mail-40132.protonmail.ch X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.help:147637 Archived-At: On Tuesday, August 13th, 2024 at 12:26 AM, Yuri Khan wrote: > On Mon, 12 Aug 2024 at 18:41, Heime heimeborgia@protonmail.com wrote: >=20 > > > > How can I change the regexp so that instead of the beginning ;;; > > > > I use the comment character of the current buffer, replicated three > > > > times ? > > > >=20 > > > > (let ( (heading-regexp "^;;;\\s-+\\([HM][[:digit:]]\\)\\s-") >=20 > > Have done the following. Do I really need all this or are there better = ways ? > >=20 > > (let* ((comment-char (regexp-quote (string-trim comment-start))) > > (three-comment-chars (make-string 3 (string-to-char comment-char))) >=20 >=20 > Does that work for you? (If not, go back to solving the problem.) >=20 > Does that work in all scenarios that are important to you? (If not, go > back to solving the problem in a more general way.) >=20 > What aspects of the working solution seem unsatisfactory to you? >=20 > What hypothetical capabilities would you require in order to improve > those aspects? Is a string-trim required for comment-start ?