From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#7148: 24.0.50; fails to compile packages flim and lookup Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:54:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87ocbcwv98.fsf@shi.workgroup> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1286051194 30379 80.91.229.12 (2 Oct 2010 20:26:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rfrancoise@debian.org, 7148@debbugs.gnu.org To: Gregor Zattler Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 02 22:26:31 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P28f8-0007iE-Ie for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 22:26:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59298 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P28f7-0002KT-Sv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=53286 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P28eu-0001vl-S5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:26:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P28Qh-00010F-6v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:11:36 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41819) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P28Qh-00010B-45 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:11:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P286o-0004Pp-Ax; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 7148 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 7148-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B7148.128604906116967 (code B ref 7148); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 7148) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Oct 2010 19:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P286n-0004Pc-Cl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P286l-0004PX-6F for 7148@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:50:59 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P289g-0006Xi-Bn; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:54:00 -0400 X-Spook: FSF blackjack covert video S Key Arnett UNSCOM Saddam X-Ran: Yzoyoq:wI#Q\\&-k`6NvS.nX=iFXFo)8D:]1y!D#4O3]f,*Xq@$anh (Glenn Morris's message of "Sat\, 02 Oct 2010 15\:33\:16 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:51:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40647 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > It's the same issue. Is anyone reporting this to the maintainers of > these Debian packages? They need to update their code. It was classified as "wishlist"? http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588189 Old-style backquotes are going away. Perhaps the ability to compile these files will be restored for 24.1, perhaps it won't. Why not just fix the old code? It will have to be done at some point.